Which came first? The red cross or…the Red Cross?

>>Which came first? The red cross or…the Red Cross?

So Johnson & Johnson, a family company, is suing the American Red Cross for trademark infringement of its red cross.

This oughta be fun.

112 years ago ARC founder Clara Barton (apparently unwisely) agreed that J&J had exclusive rights to use a red cross to sell bandaids and first aid kits and the like. Now the Red Cross has gotten into the business of selling first aid kits, too, and J&J says the whole red cross thing is a violation of its trademark agreement.

ARC CEO Mark Everson has responded in a remarkable combination of flag-waving and chagrin over Ms. Barton’s apparent short-sightedness. The first aid kits sold by the ARC for both fund-raising and to “help Americans prepare for disaster.” The Red Cross will probably do a great job of portraying corporate giants beating up on poor little humanitarians like ARC. (Of course, calling ARC poor or little is akin to not noticing the two-ton elephant sitting next to you on the sofa.)

J&J wants ARC to stop selling medical supplies (and give J&J the profits) and to stop using the cross on anything (apparently) but signs over a first aid tent.

Interesting. I wonder if J&J is planning to sue the Defense Department next? Or perhaps just people who make money and employ red crosses, like hospitals, ambulances, pharmaceutical companies, etc., etc.?


Comments welcome! (thanks)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.